All articles

Website change should not leave search to chance.

A working guide to SEO decisions in migrations, CMS replacements, redesigns and site consolidation. Choose the situation that matches your project, then turn the advice into owned, testable work.

Find the right guide

The real risk is an unmade decision.

A checklist cannot decide whether a page should be merged, whether a navigation route should disappear, or who signs off the new CMS output. Those decisions belong in the project while there is still time to change the build.

Search planning starts with a baseline, but it should end with a clear record of requirements, owners, tests and what happened after launch. Use this collection as a brief for that conversation, not as a guarantee of rankings.

One thread through the whole project

The exact checks vary by site. The sequence does not: decide what matters, design a destination, prove the output, control the release and compare what followed with the baseline.

  1. Define

    What is changing, and which search and commercial journeys must survive?

    Change inventory, page-group baseline, decision owners

  2. Design

    Where will each important page, link and piece of information live?

    Destination architecture, content decisions, URL map

  3. Prove

    Does the real output meet requirements on normal and awkward pages?

    Rendered-template tests, redirect samples, release blockers

  4. Launch

    Who checks what, in what order, and who can stop the release?

    Rehearsal, timed control plan, live issue log

  5. Learn

    Which movement is expected, and which pattern needs investigation?

    Segmented monitoring, corrective actions, handover

Need someone to own the search workstream?

I help teams define requirements, investigate the risks, challenge the plan and set up the evidence needed before and after a major change. The work is scoped around your project, not a generic monthly retainer.